What major change did Proposal A bring to school funding in Michigan?

Proposal A significantly shifted the funding structure for schools in Michigan by reducing the reliance on local property taxes and increasing the role of state funding in education. Before Proposal A, local property taxes played a larger role in determining school funding, which led to significant disparities in funding levels based on the wealth of local communities.

With Proposal A, the funding system was restructured to provide a more equitable distribution of state resources across schools, regardless of local property wealth. This change was intended to ensure that all students would have access to a more consistent level of educational funding, thereby reducing the disparities that had previously existed. The increase in state funding aimed to support educational services more uniformly across the state, benefiting students in both affluent and less affluent areas.

The other options misrepresent the fundamental changes enacted by Proposal A. For instance, increased reliance on local property taxes contradicts the main intent of Proposal A, which sought to lessen that dependence. Implementing a flat tax for educational purposes was not a feature of this proposal, and the changes did not result in a decrease in educational funding from state resources but rather an increase in equitable access to funding.